The Pink Flamingo :: BREAKING: The Polygraph Tests Official Release

When I started on this piece this evening, I was simply going to post the PDF’s for the polygraph, and doing a bit of humble pie. BUT – since then, there are some absolutely fascinating developments. First, the polygraph expert used is a fraud. Second, someone is circulating an email about a fake WPost editorial. Third, I have an interesting little video by Larry Sinclair. There is something going on here. Either the man is telling the truth, or he is a nut job to be feared. I want to know why White House used a polygraph expert who is a known fraud.

The one thing that concerns me the most is the fact if we were dealing with any other candidate other than Barack Obama this would be all over the MSM. But – it isn’t. Why? Is Barack Obama that sacred?

I am also left with an additional observation: What if the allegation that David Axelrod paid off White House. Com with three quarters of a million dollars is true?

Why did White House hire a known fraud to analyze the “results”?

I’m sorry, but I now have more questions than I did yesterday.

Why isn’t the MSM working on this story? If this were any other candidate, or any given Republican this information would be enough - even allegations - to destroy a GOP campaign. Why is the MSM sitting on it? Why is Barack Obama more sacred than other candidates and must not be subjected to the same vetting?

I have no idea if this man is telling the truth. But things have reached the point where Sinclair's allegations of harassment need to be examined, simply to be debunked. If he is telling the truth, will it even matter?

My next question: Will Larry Sinclair come to a bad end? If something were to happen to this man, if one of Obama's crazed supporters were to do something violent, who is to blame? My "gut" instinct is this matter is not going to come to a good end. We all know if the allegations were being made against John McCain, Sinclair's story would be plastered everywhere. The same holds true with Hillary Clinton. Will the fact that Barack Obama is getting a free pass going to lead to something horrific? Sinclair is a very angry man. Why, I don't know. But - I think the videos showing this anger are worth watching.

What if David Axelrod did bribe Don Parisi? If he did and it can be proven, and Barack Obama is elected, it is enough to bring down his entire Administration. This alone, should cause Obama fawners to start investigating the story. Something very bad is going on here. I don't know which side it is, but it needs to be investigated.

POLYGRAPH EXPERT A FRAUD
This just gets better and juicier! Death by 1000 PaperCuts has just discovered that the “Expert” White House hired to read the polygraph results on Larry Sinclair IS A FRAUD!

“…Gelb has publicly claimed to hold a Ph.D. degree in psychology since at least 1996. I***997, he represented himself as a Ph.D. to the highest court in the land -- the United States Supreme Court -- as a co-signer of the Committee of Concerned Social Scientists' amicus brief in U.S. v. Scheffer, where he is listed as "Ed Gelb, Ph.D." No, the "LaSalle University" that awarded Gelb his "doctorate" turns out to be a defunct, unaccredited diploma mill in Mandeville, Louisiana that was owned and operated by one Thomas James Kirk, A.K.A. Thomas McPherson. I***996, LaSalle was raided by the FBI, and i***997 Kirk pled guilty to federal fraud charges. (For more on the bogus LaSalle University, Mr. Edward I. Gelb is no Ph.D., and he should stop masquerading as such.

Mr. Sinclair claims that he was not allowed to meet with Gelb before the polygraph was administered nor has he been given the name of the "second" expert Whitehouse.com will be relying on for another opinion. Sinclair claims this was a breach of the agreement between Sinclair and Whitehouse and also calls into question the veracity of the two polygraphs due to the "background" of the expert, Dr. Gelb….”

Anti-Polygraph. Org
The site, White House is owned by Dan Parisi who once was an internet pornographer.

The big question,

“… I assume by your failure to reply you are denying prior knowledge of misrepresentations by Mr. Gelb and the information I received early this morning advising me that you were paid $750,000 by Axelrod associates to set me up? Do I assume correctly….”

(You will need to scroll down to bottom of the page for the email.)

The problem with all of this is Sinclair went on the Jeff Rense show, and they are conspiracy freaks.

WHO IS LYING?
I think I am left with more questions than answers. Larry Sinclair has filed a lawsuit against Barack Obama and his campaign. I know it is naive to think that Sinclair would not have filed the lawsuit, etc if he had anything to hide, but maybe I’m just that honest about things. Then, I find this little tidbit.
Blogger News Network

“…We got an email this morning that claimed to contain the text from a Washington Post story on Thursday, February 21 2008 about Larry Sinclair, the gay man who’s polygraph test about his claims of sharing sex and cocaine with Barack Obama in 1999 will be released this week. Sinclair has alleged that he shared gay sex and cocaine/crack with Obama in the back of a limo and at a motor lodge in Gurnee, IL in 1999 while the presidential candidate was a Illinois representative. The story-editorial, according to the email, was dated February 21, 2008 and was to have been on WashPo page 1a2.
Here’s what the email said the story contained.

In late fall of 2007 Lawrence Sinclair approached campaign officials of the Sen.Barack Obama campaign, and told them a very disturbing story. Rob Allen of the Sen. Obama campaign stated. After the meeting had concluded the campaign officials ruled it off, as “just someone trying to make a buck.” The following week they received a phone call, from a man claiming to represent Mr. Sinclair, and demanding $100,000.00 as restitution for his client.

Lawrence Sinclair has filed a federal suit against Barack Obama and others for harassment since the gay man released his video on YouTube.com, a internet web-site for viewing homemade videos, alleging that, the Senator from Illinois and Mr.Sinclair shared oral sex and cocaine in the back of a Mr. Sinclair’s limo in Gurnee, IL in 1999.

The Post has learned that presiding Judge Donald Wilson is dismissing the case, due to credibility on Mr.Sinclair. Stating that the complainant has an extensive record of mischievous conduct. Further more such allegations warrant sound credible standards, which are not found in matters included in this suit.

Lawrence Sinclair was convicted of “fraud” two times and investigated eight times over 25 years, for trying to secure money for “black male” charges. Two of the defendants were political figures in Illinois and Indiana. Mr.Sinclair also has an extensive record of drug convictions. The Washington Post has learned.”…”

Death from 1000 Papercuts has additional information about the false email. Who done it?

“…Who is circulating the email with the fake Washington Post editorial?

Is it the Obama campaign? Or, perhaps just an over-zealous Obama supporter?

We can't imagine a Clinton or McCain supporter circulating the email. The email made its way to the editor at BNN also, where DBKP Obama-Sinclair stories have been posted.

In any case, Larry Sinclair has made his allegations publicly, and has been threatened for his troubles by Obama supporters and the campaign itself--according to Sinclair.

This letter--unless the editorial has been pulled, and that raises a whole other set of questions--is more evidence that tends to support Sinclair's allegations of intimidation by Obama supporters.

The plot thickens.

[NOTE: The email presented no links or other proof that this editorial exists and we can find no proof it exists, either. If anyone has a link to this supposed Washington Post editorial, send it along and we'll post it. But we don't expect to receive a link for a non-existant editorial using the term "black male" charges.]…”

Craig’s List
From White House.Com
The sex question yielded definite deception.
The drug questions indicated a deception.
WARNING: The You Tube section where these videos are found are in an “Adult” section. I don’t like posting from locations like this, but, this is necessary.

The 1st Sinclair Video

The 2nd Sinclair Video

The 3rd Sinclair Video

MY OBSERVATION
This is a very angry man. If he is telling the truth, then he is being treated like dirt. If he is not telling the truth, he could be a bit scary. Either he is a nut job or he is telling the truth. Evidently he has been the subject of more than a few threats, which I find interesting. If it were not for the fact that a fake “expert” was used to gage the polygraph I AND the fake WPost editorial email was circulated I would write him off – but why are Obama supporters scared of him?

Sinclair’s web site, with all the correspondence between he and Parisi.

According to Liberty Post, the Limo Driver’s info:

“…He posted some comments on the page and names the Limo Driver as is P. Multani from the 5 Star Limo Service as the driver of the limo that he used with Senator Obama….”

More

I know when I read the information posted from Friday at White House, there were indications that Sinclair passed the lie detector test. I found this that has more, but all just gossip.
Another site saw the “pass” information.