WHO LET THE IDIOTS OUT?
Ask not what you can do for your country,
but what Barack Obama can do for you!
Ask not what you can do for your country,
but what Barack Obama can do for you!
Have you ever seen the movie What About Bob? At one portion "Bob" played by Bill Murry, reaches a point where he has a tantrum. "I want I want, I need I need." Nothing illustrates the liberal, Democratic, and many undecided voters better that than the statement "I want I want, I need I need."
Once upon a time John F. Kennedy once said, "Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country." That was another world, an eternity, an eon ago. Today it is the other way around. For some strange and outlandish reason, the American voter now requires that their candidate make some sort of a psychological connection with them, with each and every demanding, childish one of them. The voter must "connect". There must be an emotional bond. The voter must see the humanity in them - their passion.
Consequently the candidates must pander, must prostute themselves for votes. They must come up with increasingly more destructive ways to buy votes from people who, if their votes must be bought, have no business voting. When dealing with the "undecided" voter who doesn't know his or her head from their feet, good, decent candidates are reduced to a pathetic mass of nothing.
This debate was the biggest pile of papa cow excrement I've seen to date. I've been watching debates since Ronald Reagan (that I can remember). I can day, without a doubt, this specific debate was the most boring, most annoyingly pandering slobber fest I've seen to date. What moron decided they needed "undecideds" to ask question? I will state up front that I think any dim-wit, ding-bat, stupid, pile of dung who is undecided by this late date is nothing but a dim-witted, ding-bat, stupid, pile of papa cow excrement.
What kind of mind-set is "undecided"? What sort of fool tip-toes through the tulips of 24/7 streaming information and cannot make up their stupid (I need to find another word) mind?
Right upfront I am stating that I am disappointed with John McCain's performance. He was way too over-prepared and rested. It took the edge off his attack on Obama. I have never seen anyone who can use so many words and say as little as Barack Obama does. Tonight he said nothing new. All we heard was a warmed over stump speech, times two. About the time Barack Obama was hammering John McCain on style, pandering, opining, sighing, and bull-$#@&ing, I emailed a Pink Flamingo reader in dispair. If the debate had ended at that moment, we were doomed. Fortunately Barack Obama showed his true colors and completely blew everything on that last question about Israel and Iran.
Who chose those yahoos who were sitting in the audience. The looked like rejects from some tawdry Stephen King movie where the final, mindless dregs of society were deposited in a bus depot. There they have the choice to go to heaven or hell but are so lacking in common sense and the ability to make a decision that they are stuck in limbo for all eternity. The terror of the scenario is they are brain-dead they never realize they are in limbo as they sit, waiting to the bus that never comes.
Understanding the undecided stupids who made up the undecided audience is the only thing that can enable us to even begin to comprehend the pile of papa cow excrement that was the list of questions Tom Brokow chose for the so called "debate". When I realized most of the questions were about the economy and they were being asked first, I was furious. After the last debate where the first part of the debate was spent on such questions, once again I felt we were doomed. Let's be honest here. If Tom Brokow were trying to be fair he would have asked foreign policy questions first, and economy questions second. But - who ever said anyone from NBC was ever fair?
Once upon a time John F. Kennedy once said, "Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country." That was another world, an eternity, an eon ago. Today it is the other way around. For some strange and outlandish reason, the American voter now requires that their candidate make some sort of a psychological connection with them, with each and every demanding, childish one of them. The voter must "connect". There must be an emotional bond. The voter must see the humanity in them - their passion.
Consequently the candidates must pander, must prostute themselves for votes. They must come up with increasingly more destructive ways to buy votes from people who, if their votes must be bought, have no business voting. When dealing with the "undecided" voter who doesn't know his or her head from their feet, good, decent candidates are reduced to a pathetic mass of nothing.
This debate was the biggest pile of papa cow excrement I've seen to date. I've been watching debates since Ronald Reagan (that I can remember). I can day, without a doubt, this specific debate was the most boring, most annoyingly pandering slobber fest I've seen to date. What moron decided they needed "undecideds" to ask question? I will state up front that I think any dim-wit, ding-bat, stupid, pile of dung who is undecided by this late date is nothing but a dim-witted, ding-bat, stupid, pile of papa cow excrement.
What kind of mind-set is "undecided"? What sort of fool tip-toes through the tulips of 24/7 streaming information and cannot make up their stupid (I need to find another word) mind?
Right upfront I am stating that I am disappointed with John McCain's performance. He was way too over-prepared and rested. It took the edge off his attack on Obama. I have never seen anyone who can use so many words and say as little as Barack Obama does. Tonight he said nothing new. All we heard was a warmed over stump speech, times two. About the time Barack Obama was hammering John McCain on style, pandering, opining, sighing, and bull-$#@&ing, I emailed a Pink Flamingo reader in dispair. If the debate had ended at that moment, we were doomed. Fortunately Barack Obama showed his true colors and completely blew everything on that last question about Israel and Iran.
Who chose those yahoos who were sitting in the audience. The looked like rejects from some tawdry Stephen King movie where the final, mindless dregs of society were deposited in a bus depot. There they have the choice to go to heaven or hell but are so lacking in common sense and the ability to make a decision that they are stuck in limbo for all eternity. The terror of the scenario is they are brain-dead they never realize they are in limbo as they sit, waiting to the bus that never comes.
Understanding the undecided stupids who made up the undecided audience is the only thing that can enable us to even begin to comprehend the pile of papa cow excrement that was the list of questions Tom Brokow chose for the so called "debate". When I realized most of the questions were about the economy and they were being asked first, I was furious. After the last debate where the first part of the debate was spent on such questions, once again I felt we were doomed. Let's be honest here. If Tom Brokow were trying to be fair he would have asked foreign policy questions first, and economy questions second. But - who ever said anyone from NBC was ever fair?
Dime con quien andas y te digo quien eres.
08 Bloggers Alliance
">
View my page on Political Voices of Women
![Pink Flamingo [Home]](http://i263.photobucket.com/albums/ii147/blog_photos_album/flamingo_crossing.jpg)
