I see - if someone calls you on the carpet because you smear everyone who is against ILLEGAL immigration, your response is to call them a troll.
You're starting to crack. I knew you couldn't take the heat.
==
Oh, my!! Now I have a 19 page email in my inbox - granted it was mostly cut and paste.

That one followed one in which you whined that because:
a) I use my initials
and b) you consider my email addy "strange" you've decided I'm "afraid to expose my opinions to the light of day".

?? DUH!! I'm posting my opinions here - for all to read.

So you don't like those who use initials, huh?
But you have no problem with someone identifying themselves as Victor Tabbycat?
OK... I'll be Fluffy Kitty from now on.

I also find it humorous that you think my email addy "strange".
What it tells me is that you are uninformed in many areas.
It's particularly humorous when one considers where you live.

I've read enough of your blog to know you are intellectually dishonest..

Being a patriot, doesn't mean I'm not aware that there are other perspectives on the American Revolution, and my comments were in no way "unpatriotic". How bizarre for you to think so. Your response is indicative of rigid, narrow thinking. ...so maybe it's not so bizarre after all.

cw: "And of course, you are against the war in Iraq, right???
Face it: Many oppose that on MORAL grounds."

SJ Reidhead: "In other words, you oppose the War in Iraq. How absolutely fascinating. "

Noooo... LOL...

I simply pointed out the fact that many oppose the Iraq war on moral grounds.
I said nothing about my own position, now.. did I? Noooo, I didn't.

SJ Reidhead: "Where did you read on my blog that I was opposed to the War in Iraq?"

I haven't found such a statement. THAT'S THE POINT.
Is this too complicated for you?

cw: "Surely, if you're going to take your positions based on what's moral and what's not, then to be consistent, you will need to come out strongly against GWB, et al"

Now, of all things... SJReidhead replies: "You have DEFINITELY proven you do not read my blog."

OK... show me where you've come out against GWB over the Iraq war. Sorry if I missed it. Just post a link - I really don't need my mailbox overflowing with your emails, if you don't mind.

I'll apologize if you show you have been consistent and also oppose GWB over the Iraq war. I won't agree with you, but I will apologize for suggesting that you're a hypocrite when it comes to Iraq.

...Pink, my girl, you've twisted yourself into a knot with your responses.
Something tells me, you don't even realize that.

...As a finale, you twist yourself into another knot. All by yourself. No surprise.

===
In my posts I've asked you several questions.
You don't answer them...
What's your excuse?

WELLL...???

===

Just as you discount sources other than Morris Dees, I discount him.

Tanton's famous memo shows he was was years ahead of his time in raising questions concerning the effects of mass immigration. It is extremely thought-provoking and I recommend any readers you may have to also read it, rather than rely on your less-than-honest interpretation.



As an example, you wrote:
"The memo charged that Latin American immigrants brought a culture of political corruption with them to the United States and that they were unlikely to involve themselves in civil life."

This is NOT what the memo states at all, and those who actually read it will see that at once.

One must assume that either you have not read it, (which means you didn't do your research ), or you don't understand plain English, or you choose to mislead others by out and out lying.

Here's the exact quote:

"Will Latin American migrants bring with them the tradition of the mordida (bribe), the lack of involvement in public affairs, etc.? What in fact are the characteristics of Latin American culture, versus that of the United States?"

He makes no assertions - he is merely asking questions. The whole point of the memo in question is to raise questions and encourage people to think about what are the possible ramifications due to what he correctly predicted: Mass immigration from countries to the south of the US north into the US.

Is Tanton a racist? I don't know - but I certainly don't consider Zero Population Growth or Planned Parenthood racist organizations. Hate to break it to you, Pink, not too many rational people do. They may disagree with some of the things Planned Parenthood does - but the charge of Planned Parenthood being a racist organization would be considered waaaayyy out in left field by most. Whether he is or not, you've failed to prove Tanton a racist.

Matter of fact your obvious misrepresenetation of his memo makes both your movtive and all your sources suspect. What we DO know is that he foresaw the current situation years ahead of everyone else.

I'm not Chris Simcox's biggest fan, but you cannot successfully brand him a racist - it simply isn't true. Glenn Spencer is mainly a thorn in the government's side, because he has proven the official story wrong more than once. I am sure everyone from Bush to Chertoff to Lindsey Graham would like to see him gone.

Would you like to try for Col. Al Rodriguez???

What is downright hilarious is that YOU, PINK, have ranted about the corruption of the government of Mexico - heck, you imply EVERYONE in Mexico is corrupt - which is, of course, a complete falsehood.

There is so much more where you have corrupted the truth, it's almost mind-boggling. I will from time to time educate your readers on the difference between fact and fiction - something you have no intention of doing.

It's fine to have a differing opinon, but it should be based on honest consideration and facts. Since your's is not, I cannot respect your opinion. Are you being paid by either a group or some individual to spew your twisted prattle?

SJReidhad claims: "I am a writer specializing in non-fiction and historical fiction about the Wild West. In my field, people are so vicious and so demanding that I ever state anything that cannot be backed up, footnoted, or proven. I have a reputation in my field to uphold. A writer’s reputation is only as good as they facts they present."

Given that your authorative source for your silly and innacurate statement concerning cowboys, spurs, and rattlesnakes was some girlfriend who was once married to a (drugstore?) cowboy, your reputation in your field of specialization can't be very good. In the field of political writing, honest minds should dismiss you entirely.

SJReidhead states: "I have been researching the immigration topic for well over a year."

You're a neophyte.

SJReidhead states: "I find I am getting extremely impatient with people and their absolute refuse to look at or consider anything that does not agree with their viewpoint."

I'm impatient with people who lie and manipulate.

SJReidhead states: "My friend took the article I sent him and pointed out all the suspicious information, and told me to check out the SPLC and the ADL. He than told me the ‘key words’ and buzz words to Google to find information on individuals and organizations."

Sounds like BS to me. How on earth could you be a "writer specializing in non-fiction" and not know how to do competent research with Google?? That's completely unbelieveable.

You've brought in everyone from Jesus Christ to Hitler... and call anyone who disagrees with you or calls you on your smears, a bigot, a racist, or a troll.

Your handler must be proud of you.

Thanks for making it clear that you are a personal friend of Graham. Are you being paid by his campaign to smear others? Based on your posts, that's a valid question to ask.

You want to know what I think about a whole group of people...

Well... I will tell you that my take on Laine Lawless is that she's someone who doesn't give a rat's patootie what anyone else thinks of her, and she can lose her temper. That offends the pc crowd.

Oh, yes... please post links where you have condemed LaRaza, MeCHA, and mexi-movement, among others. I'm sure you have condemed them dozens of times, right? RIGHT??